| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
''Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, relying on ''Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation'', held that to establish standing under the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) provision that creates a civil cause of action for any person or entity injured in their business or property by reason of a RICO violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she was the direct victim of the defendant's RICO violation (e.g., a business may not sue a competitor that may have gained a competitive advantage by not paying taxes). The Court explained that this construction will save district courts from the difficulty of determining an indirect victim's damages caused by attenuated conduct.
== Background ==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|